An important transmogrification

We're now a Wordpress blog with our own fancy new URL!
Ditch your old links to this page and bookmark:

transmogrifant.com














See you there, space cowboy.

Take that, boring Prius "Yes" ads.

a. We love video games.
b. We love good advertising.
c. We love sexy cars.
d. We love explosions.
e. All of the above.



Thanks to AdFreak for teh fun.

In adaptive gaming, game plays you!

I read an article in New Scientist last week about adaptive gaming - a technology that allows the game to figure out what kind player you are, and adapt the game play to be more fun for you. So if you, for instance, love killing zombies, but hate timed puzzles, the game figures this out based on your fail rates and give you more zombies and less timed puzzles.

An excerpt:

To investigate the idea, the researchers altered the game Super Mario Bros, varying parameters such as the number and type of enemies and the size of gaps between platforms in response to how the players fared. The game also records a player's moves, including how often they run and jump, and the time spent standing still.

...

Some early results appear obvious. "If you die by falling too often down gaps that is indicative of frustration," says Yannakakis. However, the approach goes beyond "common sense" associations to uncover those that are not so readily apparent, he says. In Super Mario Bros, for example, hitting bricks to release coins or stomping turtle shells and throwing them - activities not necessary to accomplish the overall goal - positively correlate with a fun experience, Togelius says.

While Super Mario Bros is an awesome game and a classic, it's not exactly Bioshock or Fallout 3. In a way, games like Fallout 3 have already been doing this for years, by letting you play the game the way you want. You like blowing shit up? Up your explosives skill and blow some shit up. You like puzzles? Up your security skill and start hacking. Even whole levels can change based on your actions, like in Fable 2, but the game never takes into consideration what you think is more fun. If it did, would the game be as good?

Or maybe the more important question is, how could this technology be used to make games (and maybe other things) better? Letting people who avoid challenges keep avoiding challenges doesn't help them, and it definitely doesn't keep them interested for long. The main benefit seems to be in keeping people who suck at games from getting frustrated and quitting. More easy stuff might equal more sales within a certain market segment, but would it make for a more enriching and memorable user experience? I don't think so.

The only way this technology benefits the user is if it finds out what she enjoys, then makes that aspect of the game progressively harder. Then she ends up being really good at something she likes doing. The applications go well beyond games.

Update: You can play the experimental Super Mario Bros game yourself here. Thanks to Fast Company for digging up the link!

WTF FTW (Why absurdity is good for you.)

Why was this ad so effective? Taken significantly farther, why do we have insanity like every freaking Skittles commercial floating around? Do we just love being fucked with or do disconnections actually make stronger connections? And how can those of us who love Skittles commercials justify our ideas that even we know make no fucking sense to the people who need to make a flowchart just to get a latte?

The New York Times weighed in yesterday with an article titled "How Nonsense Sharpens the Intellect". Here's an excerpt:

In the most recent paper, published last month, Dr. Proulx and Dr. Heine described having 20 college students read an absurd short story based on “The Country Doctor,” by Franz Kafka. The doctor of the title has to make a house call on a boy with a terrible toothache. He makes the journey and finds that the boy has no teeth at all. The horses who have pulled his carriage begin to act up; the boy’s family becomes annoyed; then the doctor discovers the boy has teeth after all. And so on. The story is urgent, vivid and nonsensical — Kafkaesque.

After the story, the students studied a series of 45 strings of 6 to 9 letters, like “X, M, X, R, T, V.” They later took a test on the letter strings, choosing those they thought they had seen before from a list of 60 such strings. In fact the letters were related, in a very subtle way, with some more likely to appear before or after others.

The test is a standard measure of what researchers call implicit learning: knowledge gained without awareness. The students had no idea what patterns their brain was sensing or how well they were performing.

But perform they did. They chose about 30 percent more of the letter strings, and were almost twice as accurate in their choices, than a comparison group of 20 students who had read a different short story, a coherent one.

“The fact that the group who read the absurd story identified more letter strings suggests that they were more motivated to look for patterns than the others,” Dr. Heine said. “And the fact that they were more accurate means, we think, that they’re forming new patterns they wouldn’t be able to form otherwise.”

Here's how I understood it: evolution has given us a handy mechanism for dealing with shit we don't understand, by distracting us with a sudden understanding of other things. Basically:

Life: "Hey, here's a purple squirrelephant eating popsicles on the bus."

You: "Wait a second..."

Your Brain: "Hey look! There seem to be more white cars on the road these days than any other color! It's probably because the we're all so sick of the clutter of the modern world, that we enjoy the peaceful retreat of a clean white surface. ...Cars. White. ...Yeah ok you can go back to whatever you were doing now."

The distraction keeps you from going insane, and as an extra benefit you've made a new observation about the world that you can now contribute to the global knowledge base via Twitter.

So the next time you need to explain to the client why one of these is a good idea, refer them to my General Theory of WTF: The less sense something makes, the more your brain looks for things that do make sense. The more you find things that do make sense, the smarter you feel. The smarter an ad makes you feel, the more positive associations you have with that brand, and positive associations = brand loyalty = $$$$. Convoluted? Yes. But that's evolution for you, baby.

"Vodka tonic, on the surface."

Just so you know, I still feel the same way about icky public touchscreens. But I have to admit it might be nice to not have to squeeze through 18 sweaty drunk people to get my order in.

Metromix sneaks a look at Madpoison Lounge from madpoison on Vimeo.

Thanks to ReadWrite Start.

Fun with AR: Strangers on a (BART) Train

Augmented reality poses all kinds of exciting opportunities for gaming and advertising alike. However, we sometimes like to ignore those and think about what can go horribly, horribly wrong.

(Click for a readable size.)

Design's gray areas

Color blindness affects about ten percent of the human population. Which means if you're a commercial artist, someone out there has had to interpret your work in grayscale. Even for experienced black and white film photographers, knowing what looks good sans color is tricky business. Enter: We are colorblind.com. The site highlights existing problems, like this one:


where the design actually gets in the way of usability for those who can't see the difference between pink and taupe. It also offers suggestions, many of which make for good design whether you're colorblind or not, like using rollover hints in addition to a legend, and skipping pie charts entirely.

This brings me to another, bigger thought: everything we design and write as professionals is made, inevitably, for strangers. Making ideas make sense to someone else is the basic challenge of living in a society, and it's our job, at the most fundamental level, to keep exploring new, better ways of doing it.

Good luck.


via monkey_bites.